Vallery Neumann 2013
Balancing on Slacklines: Modeling and Empirical Evaluation
Tags: #slackline #dynamic_balance #control
Related: [[Improved postural control after slackline training is accompanied by reduced H-reflexes]] [[Rethinking Margin of Stability - Kazanski Et Al 2022]] [[The Condition for Dynamic Stability - Hof Et Al 2005]]
Key Definitions
- Ankle Strategy: Balance strategy where ankle movements move the location of the center of pressure (COP)
- Hip Strategy: Balance strategy where the hips move the upper body counter to the lower body
- Arm Strategy/Windmilling: Balance strategy where the arms change the bodies angular momentum
- Foot strategy: Balance Strategy where movement of the feet changes the placement of the base of support (BOS)
Key Takeaways
- Neuromechanical control strategies for slacklining aren't well understood
- The 4 control strategies used in rigid surface walking (defined above) can't all be used on the line
- The BOS and COP are limited by the slackline
- The arms play an important role
- An existing simple model does not explain interaction of body segments or compare predictions to physiological movements
- This paper assumes energy consumption is minimal and stability margin is maximal
- The slackline reaction force must go from the BOS to the fictional line of the anchor point, thus can only be changed by moving the leg
- Control strategies are extremely limited, but it is possible to alter the mediolateral forces acting on the body
- Proposed model hypothesizes balance is achieved by:
- Decoupling stance leg from upper body movements
- Using the stance leg to direct the slackline reaction force vector
- Using arms to control angular momentum
- Evidence was found for decoupling the stance leg and skilled slackliners using less energy, but not for the arms as dominant control mechanism for angular momentum
Limitations
- Over relies on Hof's Margin of stability - see [[Rethinking Margin of Stability - Kazanski Et Al 2022]]